Skip to content
3

Question 12 · What risks arise?

Who is liable when AI makes a mistake?

Short version

Not the AI. Liability can fall on the manufacturer, the provider, or the person and company using the AI. Who is responsible for what depends on the individual case and is currently being newly regulated by law.

Long version

A machine is not a legal person. It cannot be sued or punished. Responsibility is therefore spread across the people and organizations in the chain. If a doctor adopts an AI recommendation without checking it, she remains responsible. If a product with built-in AI is faulty, the manufacturer can be held liable. Courts have already fined lawyers who cited court rulings invented by AI.

With the AI Act, the EU scales obligations according to risk: stricter rules apply to AI used in job applications, loan approval, or medicine than to a customer service chatbot. Switzerland is taking its own path. In 2025, the Federal Council decided to implement the Council of Europe's AI convention and to adapt existing laws in a targeted way, rather than create a separate AI law.

For companies, this means: whoever uses AI needs clear rules on who checks results and who approves them.

The AI delivers the result, a human provides the signature.
Key takeaway

Sources for this question

  • Europäische Union. (2024). Verordnung (EU) 2024/1689 zur Festlegung harmonisierter Vorschriften für künstliche Intelligenz. Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1689/oj
  • Schweizerischer Bundesrat. (2025, 12. Februar). KI-Regulierung: Bundesrat will Konvention des Europarats ratifizieren [Medienmitteilung]. https://www.admin.ch

More questions on this topic

Your question is missing?

Send it to frag [at] rogerbasler [.] ch. Selected questions will be answered and added here.

Submit a question